| Virgo |
I hope that Viktor Kassai (1975-09-10) doesn't mind people polemicizing about his most recent performance in the current UEFA Champions League. Yesterday, 2017-04-18, many people witnessed the corrupt side of soccer. Needless to say, I felt indignant.
1. In the 65th minute, Lewandowski was probably onside.
|
2. Casemiro should have been sent off. If there's ever another Hellraiser film, he should be cast as one of the Cenobites.
|
3. Vidal should not have been sent off. His last play wasn't even close to being a foul.
|
4. In Real Madrid's second goal, Ronaldo was clearly offside, but he still scored the goal.
|
5. In Real Madrid's third goal, Ronaldo was clearly offside, but he still scored the goal.
 |
|
At a congressional hearing, John McCain (1936-08-29) was caught playing poker.
Yesterday, 2019-07-15, Carlos Borrello's list of 18 female players was divulged. It is for the 2019 Pan American Games, but there's a conspicuous absence in that list. Borrello (1955-09-12) has excluded Banini. Although one can win with any team, why would anyone exclude such a phenomenal player? That controversial decision is probably a result of Borrello's hubris. He doesn't seem to value Banini's exceptional competence. He's craving attention, because he wants to become a renowned personage of soccer. It is a preoccupation that might condemn him to a future of animosity.
I'm glad to see Bonsegundo standing up for Banini. Bonsegundo was going to be convoked by Borrello, but she has decided that she's not going to be at the 2019 Pan American Games. She was part of Borrello's provisional list of 20 players, but she said that she doesn't share "decisions of that technical body." Needless to say, I love her remonstration.
I regard Banini as an indispensable player. She loves to wear the Argentine jersey, she trains well, and she's a marvelous player. Additionally, she's a paladin of fairness. She knows that Borrello was unreasonably inconsiderate.
Update (2022-01-17)
Well-deserved recognition. Estefanía Banini is certainly one of the best soccer players in the world.
Max Hartley (2003-09-01) is unhinged.
Julio Velazquez (1998-09-16) is unhinged.
Carla Faith (1961-09-16) is unhinged.
On 2023-07-27, Olga Kharlan (1990-09-04) refused to shake Smirnova's hand.
On 2023-06-06, Elina Svitolina (1994-09-12) refused to shake Sabalenka's hand.
Those two females of Virgo have shown disrespectful conduct. During the 2008–2009 school year, shortly after I finished a particular debate in debate class, I offered a handshake to all of the opponents that I had that day. They all accepted to shake my hand, except for one female who decided to remain with her arms crossed. When she noticed that I offered her a handshake, she shook her head, and she kept her arms crossed. I'm grateful to have had the opportunity to debate her, and I'm grateful to have had such a wonderful debate teacher (1950-08-18) who gave everyone enough freedom to debate properly. I sympathize with Smirnova and Sabalenka, and I send them lots of good vibes.
In soccer, a player being substituted "must leave by the nearest point on the boundary line."
Yesterday, in a match between Newell's Old Boys and Lanús, Cristian Ferreira (1999-09-12) realized that he was being substituted, and he was very close to the boundary of the field of play; nevertheless, he refused to follow the rules, and he also refused to follow the referee's orders. He ended up receiving a second yellow card.
Yesterday, in an assassination attempt, a male (2003-09-20) of Virgo shot Trump. I'm glad that Trump is doing well, and I hope that he recovers quickly.
|
| Libra |
Photobucket, led by John Corpus (1964-10-19), has decided that its previously free service of third-party hosting should, now, cost 399.99 USD per year. By the way, there are no monthly payments. They actually expect users to make a single payment of 399.99 USD per year. Some users are probably inclined to make the payment, but those are mostly the ones who rely on Photobucket links to make some money. Nevertheless, I believe that Photobucket has been inconsiderate. Millions of users have put their trust in Photobucket, but, now, many of those users are realizing that there are new consequences that they will never tolerate. Since the change in policy, a tremendous multitude of users has decided to leave that website. Photobucket should accept most of the blame for that.
Omar (1982-10-04) doesn't seem to like the U.S.
Charlie Kirk (1993-10-14), the executive director of TPUSA, should accept most of the blame for such an embarrassing display.
O'Rourke (1972-09-26) is a joke.
Apparently, Richard Dennis (1957-10-02) didn't identify his target.
Recently, Milo (1984-10-18) released a recording that appears to have Richard Spencer's voice. I suppose that Milo's intention was to show that Richard is a racist, because Milo said that the recording has "strong racial epithets throughout." I don't think that there are many people who thought that Richard is not a racist, but what I know for sure is that Milo is a very repugnant personage who has denigrated a lot of people. On 2017-02-17, during Overtime with Bill Maher, Bill told Milo: "See, you always have to fight with everybody." Milo quickly replied: "I don't." He also said that Bill always invites "such awful people," and that "they're so stupid." Milo is also known for making sexist jokes against women, but something that I remember very well is that Milo broke a promise regarding the release date of his book. He said that the book was going to be released on 2017-03-14; however, on 2017-02-13, he changed the release date to 2017-06-13.
On 2017-02-20, Milo lost his book deal.
(On 2017-07-04, Milo's book was finally released.)
On 2015-09-06, a female (1991-10-29) of Scorpio signed a petition that caught my attention; therefore, I decided to take a screen shot of that petition.
Now, I have an idea. I'm thinking that the U.S. government should swap Milo for Katie Hopkins and 50,000 refugees.
Update (2021-02-16)
On 2019-11-08, I called Milo "a very repugnant personage." Today, 2021-02-16, I still believe that Milo is a very repugnant personage.
Sabina Frederic (1965-10-13) is a joke. She said that the Tasers "will be used only by members of the special bodies of the federal forces for cases of extreme gravity like kidnappings and taking of hostages."
Jorge Ameal (1948-10-19), the current president of Boca Juniors, is a coward. Today was a convenient day for Boca Juniors, because the club had the opportunity to show that it can still play great soccer during an emotional day for many Argentines. However, Jorge Ameal chickened out. Boca Juniors requested to postpone today's Copa Libertadores match, primarily because the club didn't want to possibly lose on such a special day. Today, Diego Maradona (1960-10-30) died. He was an excellent soccer player, and many people even regard him as the best soccer player in the history of the sport. He played soccer for Boca Juniors, and he was also a big fan of that club. Today, Boca Juniors shot itself in the foot. The club probably lost some of its fans, because there are many people who truly dislike cowards.
Here's an example of discrimination:
Maybe someone should inform Dr. Linda Marraccini (1953-10-19) that vaccinated people are also capable of transmitting SARS-CoV-2.
On 2021-09-07, I donated 300.00 USD to America's Frontline Doctors, because I want the truth to prevail.
Update (2024-03-18)
Yesterday, in Argentina, a soccer player committed a despicable act. Juan Manuel Insaurralde (1984-10-03) received a red card, and he grabbed the referee by the nape.
Ursula von der Leyen (1958-10-08) is out of her mind.
River Rosenquist (1995-10-16) is likely to recidivate, because he has no regard for the rule of law.
Today, in a soccer match between Boca Juniors and Always Ready, a soccer player committed a despicable act. When Fabra was on the ground, Rodrigo Ramallo (1990-10-14) kicked him in the face.
Matthew Desha (1986-09-29) is unhinged.
|
Females of February 26
Hopefully, the next paragraphs will have faithful information that will cover the majority of these people. I'm comfortable with the satisfactory degree of accuracy of my analyses about this day and month of birth. I hope that my conciseness won't disappoint.
Females of February 26 tend to be tolerant, considerate, and affectionate, but mostly toward the humans that they accept with immense goodwill. (Anyone who isn't part of that fortunate group should not expect to receive a generous, valuable act.) Just to be a bulwark in favor of those humans, they are disposed to use lies and intense pressure. February 26, which is particularly known for its unilateral strategies that are enveloped in abject inequity, is unlikely to develop mortification.
The distasteful intransigence of February 26 could leave skirmishes bereft of a scintilla of novelty; therefore, an opposing participant would be likely to become discouraged. With that precarious state, the chance to have a productive discussion is degraded; nevertheless, the appearance of compunction is improbable. (This has no connection with the possibility of having a poor capability to ratiocinate.)
They are inclined to disesteem the meritorious significance of a victory in any competition. When demonstration of competence is impugned, substantial dissimilitudes in ability don't usually get perceived in a fair way. If respectable criterions won't be supported or accepted, these women would be advancing through an indecorous, unstable route.
They have an innate capability to create and exhibit solid strategies with which to defend themselves. These people are furtive and astute. They have a marvelous perspective on ways to efficiently attenuate an attack against them. No one should undervalue their vigor. Indubitably, their determination is praiseworthy.
If, in front of several people, it personally thanks only one specific person for something, that's probably an indication of its kindness for that person. A public invitation to share something with it could also be seen as a cute gesture. These things are relevant, primarily because this day and month of birth isn't really known for being open about its acceptance and gratitude.
They have a very strong affinity with particular creatures of Gemini. Although some of the similarities are remarkable, probability for matrimony is far from being entirely on the same path. These females are more likely to contract matrimony with someone of Cancer or Virgo.
Females of October 29
If you were to take a trip to the area where she's living at the moment of the trip, consider sending her evidence of that visit. If she doesn't tell you something in relation to it, then she rejects an opportunity to benefit the stability of the association that you have with her.
Some of these creatures will victimize themselves; additionally, they will blame innocent people. They will lie about the condition of some of their associations. During some moments, they'll probably desire to influence you to help them; however, they probably won't care about your morale. Don't be so quick to attempt to ingratiate yourself with an inconstant brawler that might defile your dignity.
Consider telling her numerous things concerning some of your activities that don't occur in the Internet. If she's your across-the-street neighbor, I don't care. If this day and month of birth never informs you about some of the activities that it performs outside the Internet, then that's an antagonistic indication. In a conscientious way, you should analyze the impact that such lackluster situation could have on your composure.
If they decide that there should be an irrevocable cessation of the interaction, you won't be likely to receive sincere statements about that decision. Sometimes, these women depart in silence. Sometimes, though, they contrive and exhibit deceitful conflicts that are primarily aimed to dissuade you from presenting resistance in favor of maintaining the interaction.
Although they wouldn't hesitate to break a possible promise of theirs, they are disposed to tolerate insults and a multitude of indelicate questions from any person that they might adore. That's a very inveterate disposition that is unpropitious to generate motivation in people who have regard for equity and objectivity. You're welcome to treat October 29 with sublime respect, but that won't be advantageous for the state of your association with it.
As long as the creature makes efforts to invigorate the interaction, you should feel satisfied; however, don't get presumptuous. Those efforts are not necessarily redolent of exemplary benignity. When October 29's technique, velocity, and originality join some of its highly egoistic inclinations, the peril is augmented. (Usually, the creature doesn't dissimulate well; therefore, don't affright yourself.) If you truly desire to continue with the association, you should be very careful.
Females of July 2
This topic is about some females of July 2, but only the ones who belong to those categories that I have highlighted. I concentrated on a multitude of interactions that some females of July 2 have had with different people, and I also interacted with many females of July 2. Although I esteem this experience as a tremendous opportunity to learn, I was unpleasantly astounded by these women. This has been a tough experience that helped me to reconsider the potency of my determination.
July 2 seems to have a predisposition to reproach people, but it appears bereft of an efficient strategy. Such behavior is more like a pile of improvisations that leads absolutely nowhere. July 2 is more inclined to seek a quick, trivial result than to actually develop the dedication to try to learn in a convincing, respectable way. Although July 2 shows signs of impetuosity, I believe that this is mostly indicative of clumsiness.
July 2 will denigrate like a nonconformist who disregards any kind of behavioral code. It will confront without shame, and, sometimes, it will also disfigure reality; nevertheless, July 2 could still start crying right afterwards. If July 2 were to start crying, particularly if it was the only person who conveyed an attack, it may not be genuine sadness. It may be some kind of duplicity that should be analyzed thoroughly. July 2 has an apparent obsession with controlling situations, and that could be a relevant part of what's actually going on. By the way, that apparent obsession is probably making these women appear dull. Although their comportment is still intriguing, some people could easily be struggling to find motivation that could help them to learn more about July 2.
July 2 has puerile characteristics that tend to defy civility. July 2 has uttered some of the most repugnant things that I've ever heard in my life. Those things are usually inane comments that rarely bring productivity to a conversation, but they are a sign of how shameless July 2 can be. For example, how can one possibly joke about chopping up someone's rectum?
Although July 2 has a multitude of infantile moments, there are some serious moments when it may show a belligerent inclination that tends to be accompanied by a peremptory tone. Such inclination is probably related to its apparent obsession with controlling situations. July 2 may feel a fervent desire to have control, even if the situation is completely innocent. Here's a veridical example:
| Male friend of hers: |
"are you coming?" |
| Female of July 2: |
"wait a minute. You don't have the authority to demand anything from me." |
| Male friend of hers: |
"what are you talking about? I simply asked you a question." |
| Female of July 2: |
"I'm here in peace, and I leave whenever the fuck I want." |
| Male friend of hers: |
"okay. I was just asking a question." |
|
These women may assign disrespectful sobriquets to certain people. While they will have no problem calling a particular person by its forename, you might be one of the people who will get called "dipshit" or something similarly offensive. I'm talking about permanent sobriquets that they might use to try to get your attention.
They seem to be fond of mythomania, especially when they're recounting some anecdotes. They might even add a contemptuous gesture, and that's actually normal for them. Some of them will imperil themselves immoderately, but they're not likely to realize it. I believe that some of them are too careless.
Taurus choosing Scorpio
This message is directed towards some males of Taurus, but it is definitely not directed towards people born on April 24, May 6, May 10, and May 14. (I'm a male of Taurus, by the way.) Instinct can be useful for many different things, and it can certainly help us in finding people of Scorpio. There is a natural attraction, and we probably can't attenuate it. Although instinct can be like a primary guide, the actual convenience of a possible association with females of Scorpio is exclusively about some of their qualities. We need those qualities to improve some of the ways with which we learn, with the intention of improving our overall comportment in relation to our likelihood of survival. This is never about pulchritude. (Although there are many differences among these females, one of the most common postulates is that Scorpio and Taurus complete each other.)
If we were to try to establish a relationship with Scorpio, we should consider relying on our avidity, dedication, and pauses. Let's not get carried away by wishful thinking. Let's not even think about possible affability in Scorpio, or that a novel opportunity could be manna from heaven. We have to be methodical and careful, partially because that's how we're likely to acquire reliable results that will help us to properly enhance our main strategy. Furthermore, we don't have the great velocity of thought that Scorpio tends to have.
At some point, we might think that we're going to have to reorient one of our strategies; however, let's not think of these females as conditionable. We might propound something to try to simply invigorate the interaction, but they might take it the wrong way. We should try to let them be themselves more often than not, partially because some of them will want to consistently uphold their egotistical inclinations. (That's probably why some of them frequently hang out with people of Scorpio or Cancer, and that's why you might hear some of them saying something like "I'm not 100% satisfied," or saying something like "it's my way or the highway.") Although there will probably be a multiplicity of misunderstandings and disagreements, we should always consider letting things proceed peacefully; however, we still have to protect the integrity of the communication. The dialogue will always be crucial, partially because it can help us to realize whether there is a relevant degree of understanding or not. The dialogue can also help us to increase the probability to have productive conversations with these females, but, most importantly, it can help us to witness some of those coveted qualities that we will need to become significantly better humans.
During one of their histrionic speeches, where they're likely to prevaricate, they might divagate towards a delicate and contentious issue. We might think that we're going to have to resort to a transcendent performance, but, in reality, we should probably relax ourselves. Let's not get commoved by the dismal situation. We should let them run their mouths. (Particularly considering that they are fond of indifference, I'm sure that they will understand.) There are certain issues that probably shouldn't be solved in the heat of the moment. We have to get used to tolerating many adverse results, primarily because this is not about seeking stability. Although we should believe in the prospect of feeling happiest with Scorpio, we have to remain realistic: there will be many contrastive points of view between Scorpio and Taurus.
Whenever they inveigh against one of our actions, we need to make sure that we don't develop diffidence. Some of them might try to bring us into disrepute, but that's improbable. They're much more likely to try to personally hurt us with their strong side, and, after that, they'll probably leave quickly. Some of them are conceited, and that's partially why they might not give us the opportunity to respond; additionally, such possible decision is usually in accordance with prejudice.
There might be a weird connection between Scorpio and its mother. I have witnessed high reverence between them, and I'm starting to think that Scorpio is disposed to prioritize its mother. Some females of Scorpio actually said that they won't live far away from that family member, and some of those females also have a tattoo in favor of that family member. If the mother tells Scorpio to get rid of Taurus, and Scorpio assents to it, we have a problem. If we get into a relationship with Scorpio, here's one of the first things that we should say towards Scorpio: "I hope that this relationship will be exclusively between you and I, because I really wouldn't want another person, like your MOTH-ER, to possibly intervene in a significant way." We're probably going to have to say it, even if the mother is dead.
There are times when some of these females will take too much credit for something they've done. They might be talking about their kids, and they might say something like: "I raised them on my own." Even if they were with the father of the kids the whole time, they'll still make such ridiculous claim. Another thing that I would like to bring up is that some of these females refuse to accept part of the blame, even when they're clearly guilty. It happens frequently, and I will share one of my personal experiences about this. I used to have a friendly relationship with a particular female of Scorpio. She lied about something, and there was evidence to prove it. After I showed her the evidence, I asked: "were you not being sincere towards me?" She replied: "I guess not." After that, she quickly added: "can you blame me?" I responded: "you're too angelic; it's all good." (I value her, and she knows that I wanted to keep her in my life.)
We're probably going to have periods of overwhelming motivation, but let's not disregard our sense of security. We should keep cogitating on injurious possibilities, primarily because we have to get better at anticipating some of the inauspicious situations that are product of carelessness. We shouldn't be inclined to be opportunists.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |